Polisy of the Conference

The International Conference on AI and Computing Innovation (ICAICI) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic quality, integrity, and fairness in its peer-review process. All submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous review procedure to ensure originality, technical soundness, relevance, and contribution to the field.

1. Review Model

   ICAICI adopts a double-blind peer review process. Authors’ identities are concealed from reviewers, and reviewers’ identities are not disclosed to authors. This approach ensures impartial evaluation and minimizes potential bias.

2. Reviewer Assignment

   • Each paper is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with expertise relevant to the submission’s topic.
   • Reviewers are selected from the Technical Program Committee and invited external experts.
   • Conflicts of interest are strictly avoided.

3. Evaluation Criteria

   Submissions are evaluated based on the following criteria:

   • Originality and novelty of the research
   • Technical quality and methodological soundness
   • Relevance to the conference themes and tracks
   • Clarity and organization of the manuscript
   • Significance and potential impact of the results
   • Adequacy of references and positioning within related work

4. Review Outcomes

   Based on reviewers’ recommendations, submissions may receive one of the following decisions:

   • Accept
   • Accept with minor revisions
   • Accept with major revisions
   • Reject

   The final decision is made by the Program Chairs after considering reviewers’ reports and overall conference quality balance.

5. Revision and Resubmission

   • Authors of conditionally accepted papers must address all reviewer comments and submit a revised version within the specified deadline.
   • Revised papers may be re-evaluated to verify that concerns have been adequately addressed.

6. Plagiarism and Ethical Standards

   • All submissions are subject to plagiarism screening using standard similarity detection tools.
   • Papers containing plagiarism, self-plagiarism, fabricated data, or other ethical violations will be rejected without review.
   • ICAICI adheres to established academic ethics and publication standards.

7. Confidentiality

   • Submitted manuscripts and review reports are treated as confidential documents.
   • Reviewers may not share, discuss, or use the content of submitted papers for any purpose other than review.

8. Author Responsibility

   • Authors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy, originality, and integrity of their work.
   • Submission implies that the manuscript has not been previously published and is not under review elsewhere.

9. Final Manuscript and Presentation

   • At least one author of each accepted paper must register and present the paper (onsite or online, according to the conference format).
   • Failure to present may result in exclusion from the conference proceedings.